Subject:
Summary before
LEG 91 - available insurance |
From: Erik Røsæg |
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 08:41:05 +0200 |
To: Athen-korrgr |
Dear Correspondents,
Despite the radio silence in the Correspondence Group
the last weeks, there has been a fruitful dialog between some interested
parties. There are still a few loose ends to tie up, and /all /interested
parties must obviously get a chance to take part in the discussions and have
time and opportunity to consider the proposals. I therefore foresee the
following procedure:
* An informal working group Monday and Tuesday of the Legal
Committee next week, either set up by the plenary or
working in
the fringes
* An outline of an agreed way forward in the plenary session
Wednesday morning
* Final decision at LEG 92
Information from the industry - some of which was only confirmed to me last
night - indicate that the Athens Convention can be implemented quite smoothly:
1. The non-war Athens cover (with BioChem
exemptions, etc as
envisaged in the LEG documents) are likely to be
offered by the
P&I Clubs for currently entered vessels if - but
only if - the
terrorism insurance issues can be resolved in a way
the
clubs/shipowners find satisfactory.
2. The key element of a satisfactory solution of the terrorism
insurance issues - seen from the
shipowners'/mortgagees' point of
view - would probably be to avoid liability that is
not insurable.
This problem can be overcome by ensuring that the 1996
LLMC limit
(SDR 175,000 per passenger) applies to
terrorism-related
liabilities pursuant to Article 19 of the Athens Convention.
Insurance would then be available. A moot point in
this context is
whether the shipowners should remain liable if the
insurance is
canceled (under the terms of the insurance).
3. The insurance referred to in #2 above is subject to policy
defences and has no
provisions for direct action. A CLC-type
insurance for the additional protection of passengers
would
therefore be advantageous. A well-reputed
informed that that such insurance is available up to
USD 500 mill.
subject to such exemptions as
envisaged in the LEG documents. (The
limit envisaged in the LEG documents was USD 400
mill.)
I look forward to see the finalizing of this long-standing issue.
Regards,
Erik Røsæg
--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Professor Erik Røsæg (Rosaeg)
Director
Scandinavian Institute of Maritime Law
University of Oslo
POB 6706 St. Olavs plass
N-0130 Oslo, Norway
Tel: (+47) 22 85 97 52
Fax: (+47) 97 38 49 98
erik.rosag@jus.uio.no
https://rosaeg.no/erikro/index.html
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++